The rosette is drawn from the filing number. No two filings share one.
(57)Abstract
There is no universally accepted definition for the term ‘open innovation’. It is understood and used in a wide variety of ways by different stakeholders.
0001There is no universally accepted definition for the term ‘open innovation’. It is understood and used in a wide variety of ways by different stakeholders. This implies that diverse IP models may be employed while practising open innovation, and there may be substantial differences in ownership rights and usage rights with regard to knowledge accruing from the process.
0002In this context, this project is trying to explore – (i) different models of open innovation; (ii) different IP models through which firms/ individuals practise open innovation; and (iii) whether the current innovation/ IP policy measures are the most optimal ones for fostering open innovations which are social and collaborative in nature.
0003We will be using the mixed methods approach for exploring those dimensions.
0004As a part of the project, we have tried to map the diverse definitions of ‘open innovation’. Our working document in this regard can be accessed from here. If you have any suggestions or comments (or if you wish to add any definitions that are missing there), please add it as a comment on the document or email us.
0005If you have any specific queries or suggestions regarding this project, please drop an email to arul.scaria@nludelhi.ac.in.
Cite as
Centre for Innovation, Intellectual Property and Competition, ‘Open Innovation’ (CIIPC/R/006, National Law University Delhi) <https://ciipc.pages.dev/research/open-innovation/>
5 numbered paragraphs. Select a number to copy a citation to that paragraph. Questions about this project go to the principal investigator named here, or to ciipc@nludelhi.ac.in. Text carried over from the earlier ciipc.org.